Start free
← All guides

Comparison

A visual alternative to Terraform for AWS

Terraform is powerful and text-based. If you'd rather see your infrastructure as a diagram that deploys for real, here's how a canvas-based approach compares.

Updated 2026-07-15

Terraform is excellent, and for a platform team managing hundreds of resources across environments, code is the right answer. But a lot of people reach for Terraform for a much smaller job — stand up a few resources, wire them together, see them run — and end up fighting HCL, state files, and providers for something they could have drawn in a minute.

If that's you, a visual approach is worth a look. Here's an honest comparison.

What Terraform gives you

That's genuinely great for teams and scale. The cost is a learning curve, a state file to manage, and the fact that your infrastructure lives as text you have to build a mental picture from.

What a canvas gives you

Korve takes the same idea — declare what you want, let the tool reconcile it with reality — but the declaration is a diagram you drag together, and deploying provisions real AWS resources:

Where each one wins

Reach for Terraform when infrastructure-as-code review, multi-environment pipelines, and a large team are the point. The text is the feature.

Reach for a canvas when you want to understand a system at a glance, stand something up quickly, or hand a non-Terraform-fluent teammate something they can actually read. The picture is the feature.

They're not mutually exclusive philosophies — they're different answers to "how do I want to see my infrastructure." If you've ever drawn your architecture on a whiteboard before writing the HCL, the canvas is that whiteboard, except it deploys.

Try it

Connect an AWS account and build a two-resource stack. It takes about as long as reading this did.

Build this on a canvas instead of the console.

Start Korve free →